Ten Days in China

Pacificvs makes his first visit to the Middle Kingdom

Having abandoned it’s red ambitions long ago, China’s foray into a capitalistic authoritarian gray zone is at least monochromatically consistent with the physical China: a fleshy and penetrating gray, the color of a rotting tombstone.

China is penetrating, and oftentimes beautiful. Even a smog choked skyline can transport the viewer to the wispy trees, craggy monoliths, and misted valleys of an early Ming Dynasty watercolor. But it’s not all romance. When the same hue begins to arrive in your morning cough several days in, however, you begin to suspect less pure forces are at work.

Then you see the nuclear power plant in the middle of town. There it is, right next to the coal plant. Several miles away, you see the exact same combo: nuclear and coal. And apartments. Lots of apartments.

This is Xian. Xian is instructive because it’s neither Shanghai nor Beijing, China’s two showcase cities. Xian is like Yuma, Arizona: sprawling and utilitarian. Two years ago, one can tell, it had no skyline. If you only count finished buildings, it still doesn’t have much of one. But when you consider what’s under construction…I counted no fewer than eight clusters of 15-25 tenement buildings, each 40 stories high and probably twenty units across. As the largest consumer of steel in the world, the metal is in short supply in China, so bamboo is used for scaffolding–to a spectacular effect.

With 8 million residents, Xian would be America’s third largest city. In China, it’s a backwater. Inside the city wall, apparently the best preserved in all of China, one finds plenty of unfortunate architectural survivors of the communist era. The buildings are concrete and uninspired and, of course, gray. Covered in tacky neons, the place looks and feels like a prison converted into a casino, which, in post-communist China, in a way I suppose they are. It looks unnatural and poorly conceived, like you’ve been transported into a SimCity built with lots of cheat codes. Overwhelming pollution, consistent filth, bizarre infrastructure, Frogger roadways, and general dreariness–despite the recent economic gains–Xian doesn’t look like the China you’ve read about so much as it feels like the China you expected. It’s important for American students of China to visit such places.

Beijing
The Hilton Wangfujing is near the Forbidden City. Here the streets are spotless and the shopping is high-end. Drivers observe traffic lights. This is obviously a new development, probably constructed in time for the Olympics, and is precisely the “China” Beijing wants to showcase to the world: modern and refined. To their great credit, the Chinese achieve this sense of modernity without sacrificing their culture’s greatest asset: their food.

Forget the walls and the temples, it’s the food that is the single greatest achievement of the Chinese Civilization. Hot pot, dim sum, peking duck…every single restaurant will dare you to exclude it from your top-five list. But for that extra touch of adventurism, there it is, in the heart of the shopping and modernity: the exotic food market.

Squid, octopus, snake. Grasshoppers, silkworms, crickets. Lamb penis and lamb testicles. And yes, dog, and cat (oddly enough, they both look like hash browns). But it’s not what you’re thinking. The presentation is clean and fresh, with a flair for design. This is obviously regulated for the foreign tastes watching from the surrounding hotels. The vendors are friendly but scheming: be wary of any “deals” and demand that they repeat your order before you hand over cash.

Speaking of culture, on my way to China I began reading Romance of the Three Kingdoms, one of China’s oldest novels. One gets a taste of the type of heavy metal badassery within when they read the title of the very first chapter:

Feast in the Garden of Peaches;
Brotherhood Sworn;
Slaughter of Rebels;
The Brothers Heroes.

Taken in just prior to visiting the Great Wall, the Terra Cotta Soldiers, and the Hall of Overwhelming Glory, ancient Chinese literature helps you understand that you are in a place where the rulers take themselves very, very seriously.

In both Midnight’s Children and The Satanic Verses, Salman Rushdie’s Indian characters respond to the English disdain for bidets with revulsion (“They only use paper”!). They should visit China: except for the hotels, sitting toilets don’t exist, and neither does toilet paper, let alone bidets. Paper towels are nowhere to be seen, and although every bathroom, it seems, has an air dryer, none of them work. Not kidding: zero.

Shopping
At any given retail situation in China, whether for tea or chachkis, you will almost certainly find that the store is crazy overstaffed. At the airport, fifteen people greet you off the plane. Six welcome you to the tea shop. Eight servers wait on your table at restaurants. Even at Starbucksthe employees often outnumber the customers. Many times, one finds themselves walking to a store and being forced to repeat familiar lines: “I don’t know what I’d like…I don’t even know what you sell…I’m just looking”. There is a lot of standing, staring, and cutting in line.

All this leads to a shopping experience that, to a Westerner, is plainly ridiculous. Every step you take is matched by at least two “helpers” who flank you at the sides. They mime you as you browse the shelf, pointing at and naming the objects passing your gaze. “Toy”. “Hairbrush”. “Cat”. Instead of shopping, you’re mostly congratulating people on their English. “Very good”. “That’s correct”. “Right again”!

Visitors to Beijing’s Silk Market are given a taste of what to expect by the two giant banners which greet them: “Protect intellectual property rights, be law-abiding vendors”. China has a thriving black market. Chanel handbags that push $2,000 at the Wangfujing mall fetch $60 at the Silk Market. Men’s swiss Bally leather satchels are knocked from $1,000 to $30. Even Rosetta Stone Mandarin is only $15 (a dangerous sale considering one tends to get things slightly cheaper if they can exhibit some control over Mandarin). Wendy tailors makes excellent suits and in good time. Sunny, her assistant and apparent translator, drives a hard bargain, but it’s hard to be upset at a custom fitted three-piece suit and shirt for under $200.

Not for latinas.

Living in San Francisco’s Mission, a neighborhood with plenty of discount clothes and lots of mannequins, I was surprised to find the little ways in which different standards of beauty manifest around you. Also surprising was how the tourists are overwhelmingly Chinese. From every corner of this vast country, many have never seen white people before, and on many occasions you will be stopped and asked to pose for a photo. But nothing prepared me for the near obsession the Chinese had with James, the 16 month old infant which traveled with us. In a land of few children, James is not only male (much preferred), but also half white/half Asian, or “mix blood” as they put it. Not kidding: mobs of gawkers, at one point numbering in the dozens, would gather around James and stare.

China seems to have uniformed military officers everywhere: guiding traffic, taking tickets at museums, marching through this plaza or that. Even private-security guards and postmen looked like 5-star generals. What’s stranger is that at the places you’d expect some authorities, like at the Forbidden City, you’ll instead find plainclothes guards. It’s very strange watching guys in sweatpants and hoodies on the other side of the rope looking stoic and at the ready. There’s only two possible reasons why the Chinese do this: to take foreigners “off” the defensive, or much more likely, to put the locals “on”. The plainclothes guards are a very visible example that you never know who works for the government.

Spread out before the Forbidden City is Tiananmen Square and the body of Chairman Mao, lying in state. It’s true what you’ve read: people don’t know much about the ’89 massacre. Our tour guide, who we’ll call Sharon, inquired about the protest, and informed us that she had never seen the iconic picture of the lone man standing in the face of a line of tanks.

Ignorance about Tiananmen is unsurprising. The Great Firewall is significant enough, and state censorship complete enough, to trip up news junkies and researchers. My iPhone couldn’t access Facebook, and both Google and Safari were significantly disrupted. Baidu, China’s most popular search engine, responds the query “Tiananmen Square Massacre” with an article titled “Tiananmen Square Massacre a Myth”. When I reached for the China Daily the morning following my Beijing arrival, I found a piece titled “China fights climate change with utmost zeal”. Peasants aren’t allowed to freely enter cities, and Chairman Mao looks good for being 118.

The easy conclusion is that China is, well, exceptional. It’s enormously foreign, and one gets the sense that they are breaking cultural taboos often. China’s longevity is among it’s most impressive feats, but you don’t really know what this means until you see it. An at-first surprising observation, is that the Chinese, wherever possible, don’t seem to let their ancient buildings lapse into decay like many have done in the West. Xian’s city wall was rebuilt in the 1980’s. So was the Beijing area of the Great Wall. The Big Goose Pagoda, which tilts in a way so familiar that the locals call it “Leaning Tower of Xian”, is not just being anchored from further slippage by government engineers, but corrected. When you point this out, people remind you that their great grandparents helped rebuild this-wall-or-that following the earthquake or the fire or the invasion or whatever it was a hundred years ago, and their great-grandparents rebuilt it following whatever catastrophe it was a hundred years before that. It makes natural sense that they’d keep it up. Doesn’t this effect the object’s authenticity? “Not at all” say the Chinese. There is a cultural continuity that is understood.

Compare this to Greece, where the architectural family jewels of the West are either mostly destroyed or simply no longer exist. The pagans who built the Parthenon lost their culture and became Christianized following 2,000 years of endless invasion and occupation at the hands of a who’s-who of ancestral Europe’s great powers: Romans, Persians, Ottomans, English, Nazis. In a total way, the ancient Greeks really no longer exist. This is in stark contrast to China, where a region dominated by Han arts and culture, Confucius teaching, and ancestor-worship, is entering it’s 2,233rd year.

In many ways, the Cultural Revolution was Mao’s attempt at dislodging China from it’s past, a prerequisite for building the communist utopia. Many of Beijing’s classically trained artists artisans, and many of the country’s professors and intelligentsia, we’re purged, “re-educated”, and killed. It is for our great benefit that this effort failed.

Finally, something has to be mentioned about the China hysteria that I fear hasn’t even really begun. For all it’s growth, China has much further to grow still, and it’s economy is almost certain to overtake that of the US within a decade or so. These fears, I believe, are exaggerated. China has problems, big ones. Too numerous, in fact, to list in a brief essay about a brief vacation. But driving from the countryside into the cities, one sees the same thing everywhere: a bronze-age civilization surrounding a Dickensian nightmare swallowing modern a metropolis. If you live in the first two, your movements into the third are highly restricted, which is where everyone wants to be because that’s where the money is. People grumble about the one-child policy, and the cities are beginning to develop their own housing bubbles. The environmental problems are worse than you think, and I thought they were terrifying going in.

So with respect to Sinophobia, remember: the Chinese may have invented the compass, paper, printing, and gunpowder, but they also invented bureaucracy.

Waving to the people.


Oh yeah, I went to Washington DC

The Obama Crib

When I was 6 years old my parents loaded my sister and I into an RV. We disembarked Los Angeles and headed eastward, clinging to Joshua Tree’s lower half along the Interstate 10. Six hours later, we had arrived at Lake Havasu: retirement home for American humans and English bridges since 1971. Two decades and change later, my memory could use a digital remastering. But I do remember this: there was a boat, I boarded the boat, and at some point, that boat crossed an imaginary line that bifurcates the good lake down the middle, California to one side, Arizona on the other. That moment would become the first and last time that I would leave California until college.

This past year, in particular, I’ve tried to make good on seeing more of my country. In addition to Oregon, Washington state (and a respectable number of countries), I’ve added New York City on New Year’s Eve, New Orleans on Mardi Gras, and Yosemite in the early Fall to the list. I’ll be adding Utah in January. The first week of this past October, I added Washington, DC.

I was there for work and had precious few moments to myself, but precious none the less.

My favorite culture on earth is drinking culture. To this end, I can always rely (and you can too!) on a enlightening new town experience by visiting one of the given city’s FODDs (Fanciest-Oldest-Diviest-and-Douchiest bars).

(A brief digression on FODDs, San Francisco: Fanciest: Bourbon and Branch; Oldest: The Saloon; Diviest: Tough call…I’ll go with The Hockey Haven; Douchiest: Medjool).

Everybody in DC seems to readily know the oldest bar in town. It’s called Old Ebbitt Grill, conveniently located two blocks from my hotel, and across the street from the Obama crib. Forget that the food was bland (and priced accordingly), while looking over a flyer on the bar’s history, I noticed that the suspiciously beautiful place was built in…1983! Turns out Old Ebbitt is the oldest brand in town. Nobody seemed to know where the actual oldest continuous drinking establishment actually was. Defeat.

Recipe for Success.

I took a stab at the FODD douchiest, making my way to Circa on Connecticut Ave NW, as recommended by a coworker who spent time in DC as a Senate aide. Circa delivered on the basics: bronzed sugar daddy’s with and women inflicted with the plastic-surgery’s inevitable cat-face. But after one whole Maker’s–rocks–Manhattan, I didn’t see one cougar attack! I’m sorry, but even at Americano, San Francisco’s runner-up douchiest, the hunting grounds are littered with wounded young men by 7:00pm on a Monday night.

After Circa I stopped at a total gem: Kramerbooks. At this small bookstore I picked up Arguably, the latest compendium of essays by Christopher Hitchens (who, as it happens, lives only blocks away).

Like all great bookstores, Kramerbooks features a pub. Unlike a great bookstore pub, they served only one “local” beer…from Baltimore. Unlike even the greatest bookstore, Kramerbooks serves fantastic food. After first catching my nose, I saw several plates whiz past, seemingly out of nowhere: filet mignon with horseradish sour cream, BBQ ribs with mac ‘n cheese, seared scallops with organic maitakes. The scallops were unreal.

For the fanciest place the bartender recommended the Gibson, a Whiskey bar on 14th street. The Gibson, like Kramerbooks, brought with it total victory: hundreds of whiskies from around the world, and a bartender who delivered my rocks Blood and Sand with flamed orange zest.

A backstory to my evening was that, for each place I went and bartender I spoke with where I could go dancing on a Monday night. Each time I asked, I received different versions of the same opinion: “This is a government town. There’s barely dancing on Saturday nights.”

Interesting. After leaving the Gibson, I walked about four blocks before honing in, like a sperm whale echo-locating her distant calf, on a place somehow unlikely called Marvin. Hearing music from the side walk, I creeped up the stairs to find an old Edwardian-style bar packed, wall-to-wall, with dancing. Government town indeed.

Established in '83, not quite the oldest bar in town.

Pressed for time, I didn’t make it to one establishment that could qualify as a dive. Next time. I did, however, make several other observations about our nation’s capitol. The store fronts have stoops, and the sidewalks are clean, narrow, and many are brick. The marble steps of the rotunda staircase have been sharpened like to dagger-like-points just to the left and right of center, under the ceaseless plodding of the congress.

To be an American living in the Capitol City is to have a voice in neither the Congress nor the Presidency. The US Constitution predates the District of Columbia by three years, and sadly, the founding fathers neglected to ask how residents of the future capitol would vote. Thus the best license plate motto in the republic was born, “Washington DC: Taxation without Representation”.

Although I was there for work, I was lucky in that work took me to the White House and the deeper halls of the Capitol. Good times.


San Francisco Mayoral Debate: All Love.

David Chiu thinks he'd make a kick-ass mayor. Just ask him.

WHAT’s funny about the memorable phrase “all politics is local”, is that it’s so easy to forget about local politics. I was given a good refresher tonight at Public Works, where 5 candidates (Supervisors Beavan Dufty, John Avalos, and David Chiu; City Attorney Dennis Herrera; and State Senator Leland Yee) to become the next Mayor of San Francisco talked MUNI, parks, and how much they loved their opponents. Matthew Troy, co-owner of Faye’s Video & Espresso Bar, was on hand to moderate, and to transmit wisdom.

Up to this point, all that I had heard about the race to fill the Mayoral vacancy left in the wake of Gavin Newsom’s election to the most pointless office ever invented, was that it was going to be boring. Ranked choice voting has opened up an electoral path to victory whereby a candidate can win by racking up “second-choice” votes, meaning that no candidate wants to say anything that might turn-off any potential voter who might consider him for their number two pick. In short, boring.

The debate revealed the following: All the candidates support Healthy SF, ranked-choice voting, and public schools. With the exception of Avalos, they are all in support of the Park Merced development project, although they were all made visibly uncomfortable saying why. They are all opposed to privatizing parks, and in support of marriage equality. When asked to say which city department was the biggest disappointment, each of them answered “MUNI”. They all agreed that the 14 Mission bus is “Jacked”. Which it is.

Being in the Mission, they were sure to mention their support for tenants rights. They all refused to answer my question, which was who were they casting their “second-choice” vote for, even though I specifically admonished them not to duck the question. Beavan Dufty thinks bars should be allowed to stay open until 4am.

When each of the candidates were given a chance to ask their opponents a question, they served them up on platters of the purest gold. Beavan Dufty asked David Chiu to reflect on his memories of growing up in the Mission. Dennis Herrera asked John Avalos about his feelings toward the immigrant community. Avalos asked Yee if he supports privatizing parks (he doesn’t!). Only Chiu’s question to Herrera, whether, as mayor, he would have signed onto the Park Merced deal (Herrera replied “yes”), had any sort of english on it. The night’s only disagreement came between Herrera and Yee, over the former’s support for gang injunctions.

Here’s what I learned: Beavan Dufty wants you to know he likes to party, Leland Yee really wants you to know that he really likes schools, John Avalos is quite handsome, and David Chiu, with his abuse of the Clinton thumb-point, probably wants to be mayor more than all of them. That, and that ranked-choice voting, while probably still a good idea, makes for some boring politics.

As election day nears, I’m hoping we get just a smidge more fist shaking, and a touch less back slapping.


Germers: Vaccine Denialists

If you loved your kids, you'd get them vaccinated. Seriously.

It’s time to come up with a disparaging word for vaccine-autism conspiracy theorists, and I propose “Germers” to be that word. Germer: One who willfully ignores scientific evidence in order to preserve the erroneous belief, based on a single discredited 1998 paper, that vaccines are linked to autism. Example: “Johnny’s classmate, Jane, succumbed to flesh eating bacteria last week after her germer parents refused to get her vaccinated. She will be missed”.  Post this onto your blog or website, and let’s get it into the urban dictionary!


Top 10 most ridiculous Huffington Post articles of all time, ever.

IT’S tough to imagine, but the American left used to be characterized by rabble-rousing populists, immutable intellectuals, and hordes of ferocious red-necks. Today, they’re about as edgy as Deepak Chopra. When future historians document how the American left went from a rag-tag coalition of hicks, freethinkers, and suffragettes, to a zodiac therapy session of vegans and germers (vaccine denialists), they will find that the reason will fit neatly into three words: The Huffington Post.

I’m sure there are many, many more our there, but these are the top 10 most ridiculous Huffington Post articles that I have come across since downloading the iPhone app two years ago. I chose my favorites using only the most vigorous and methodical criteria. First, by how they rated on my “You have just insulted my intelligence” meter (like number 2). Others were chosen for their impressive command of Bullshit Heights’ most impenetrable vistas (number 3). Still others qualified by the force with which they choked “what-the-fuck” from your gaping, stupefied mouth (number 5).  Some of the complete articles weren’t as absurd as the headlines suggest (like the honorable mention number 12), but most of them don’t disappoint (like number 7). If you have any favorites not listed here, please add links in the comments below.

Honorable Mentions

12. ) Five Signs your Husband may be a Psychopath

11. ) PHOTOS: 9 Politicians Eating Pizza

The Top 10

10.) 10 Things to do with Mac ‘n’ Cheese Before you Die

9.) Japan earthquake and god’s will

8.) ‘Facebook Depression’: Do you have it?

7.) A divine female role model for our times?

6.) Should Christians do yoga?

5.) Carnival barkers SLAM Obama’s sideshow remarks

4.) Why you should never defend, explain or justify.

3.) The definition of rape, my rage, and Hindu Goddess Wisdom.

2.) Could nuclear war reverse global warming?

And the number 1 most ridiculous Huffington Post article of all time is…

1.) If Pop stars were breakfast cereals: A delicious analysis.


Chomsky on the Death of Osama bin Laden.

Noam Chomsky believes American power is a uniquely evil force in that it is incapable of having any other motivating factor but the lowest available to the imagination of Noam Chomsky.

ONE of the more annoying reactions to the news of Osama bin Laden’s death has been the warning that Al Qaeda will now certainly seek revenge. No, no, no. The Navy SEAL attack which killed bin Laden was revenge, thank you. Another annoying reaction has been unease at how Obama’s aggressive order hews uncomfortably close to Bush-era mentalities regarding terror. Noam Chomsky mostly sticks to the latter in his excruciating commentary on the assassination of OBL. (Read Hitchens’ response to the Chomsky article here.)

Chomsky goes unhinged in the very first sentence, declaring OBL’s sprawling concrete fortress as “unprotected”. True, the SEALS were on the unfriendly side of the 18ft defense walls of world’s most wanted terrorist’s fortress, deep into the territory of a terror-state and a stones-throw from that state’s terror-sympathizing military. But they were shot at only once, making it less of a ultra-elite-covert-operation and more of a troubled-teen-checking-in-with-his-parole-officer type thing.

He then takes on the assassination itself, criticizing (or, more accurately, quoting those who criticized) the extralegal pretense of invading Pakistan. Chomsky quotes, and obviously agrees with, the Atlantic’s veteran Middle East correspondent Yochi Dreazen:

“The decision to kill bin Laden outright was the clearest illustration to date of a little-noticed aspect of the Obama administration’s counter terror policy. The Bush administration captured thousands of suspected militants and sent them to detention camps in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Guantanamo Bay. The Obama administration, by contrast, has focused on eliminating individual terrorists rather than attempting to take them alive.”

Unilateral killings of high level terror targets inside sovereign nations who refuse/are incapable of action was a signature campaign promise from candidate Obama. Believing it to be a gaffe, the GOP even pounced on it in the run up to the 2008 primaries. Mitt Romney declared that the Senator from Illinois had gone from “Jane Fonda to Dr. Strangelove in one week”. In any case, Chomsky rejects this policy in a tone which suggests he finds it even less just than the mass indefinite detention policy under Bush. It may be. It does seem, however, that the targeted killings aren’t as politically damaging for the United States as was indefinite detention. Perhaps it is because major powers, including the US, have been engaging in clandestine murders since forever and that people simply expect it, whereas getting preachy about the sanctity of your values with one side of your mouth while defending the purgatory camp at Guantanamo Bay with the other side is to take hubris and hypocrisy to the breach.

Speaking of hubris, Chomsky goes on to assert that not only did George W. Bush commit crimes “vastly exceeding” those of OBL, but that this “uncontroversial” opinion can only be opposed by “ardent supporters” of the former President. Now, I worked damn hard as a grassroots organizer in 2004 to defeat President Bush, and that November I proudly watched the ballot box click to “000001″ as I cast both the first presidential vote of my precinct and of my life. So as an active “non-supporter” of the Bush Presidency, I respectfully disagree.

Chomsky’s moral relativism is such that he argues that since Imperial Japan and Hitler believed that what they were doing was good, we are in no position to say otherwise. Likewise, Osama bin Laden no doubt thought his franchise idea, to submit large portions of the human race to a misogynistic, homophobic, imperialistic, chauvinistic, fatalistic, backward state of credulity, was a good thing too. Who’s to say? As it happens, the dependable thing about totalitarian values is that their versions of heaven and hell are indistinguishable: homogeneity, endless praise, conformity, and obedience. Even the rosiest-totalitarian assessment leaves one with plenty of filth with which to be repelled. Contrast this to women’s rights, sexual liberation, religious liberty, and the freedoms of speech and association. Failure to admit that the bin Laden vision would have been a tremendously worse fate for our Arab brothers and sisters than team-Bush’s ambition of spreading Jeffersonian democracy is to choose to stroke an emotional attachment to America-hate at reason’s expense. That American energy firms stood to gain from the spreading of democracy changes nothing: one’s disdain for murderous oppression should be greater than their disdain for corporate profiteering, no matter how obscene.

Chomsky then goes on a bizarre tangent, whereby he accuses the US of cruelly naming it’s military weapons after peoples it has vanquished, citing “Apache”, “Tomahawk”, “Black Hawk”, and the operation to kill OBL “Geronimo”, specifically. This, he writes, would be like the Luftwaffe calling its fighter planes “Jew” and “Gypsy”. In this Chomsky manages to be simultaneously ignorant and too-clever-by-half. Apache, Tomahawk, and Black Hawk do have something in common: they are all symbols of ferocity, intimidation, and bravery. A tomahawk is an actual weapon, not a person. Geronimo may have been an actual person, but to virtually every American, “Geronimo” is an interjection commonly exclaimed immediately before one does something dangerous. It’s use was entirely appropriate.

Chomsky was one of the first intellectuals I ever admired, and I’ll always have a soft spot for him. But the less time I spend studying politics, and the more I spend on evolutionary biology and primatology, the less I see the world’s problems as a function of American design in specific, than of human design in general. Noam Chomsky, on the other hand, sees American design everywhere, and it is always malicious, always corrupt. Noam Chomsky believes American power is a uniquely evil force in that it is incapable of having any other motivating factor but the lowest available to the imagination of Noam Chomsky.

I would have liked to see OBL go to trial. I would have liked to watched as the world’s best legal minds confronted him with his crimes and explain to the human race how he has blasphemed his species and why he must die. But dead he is, and on the list of things I should be outraged over, the particulars of his assassination are way, way, down.


Closure for the 9/11 Generation

GIVEN it’s slightly get-on-with-it-already tone, the families of 9/11 victims understandably are said to disdain the word “closure”. But surely, bin Laden’s death must mean the end of something, right? Right?

It probably won’t mean the end of conflict in Afghanistan, and it can’t end the pain of the families who lost loved ones on American airplanes on 9/11, or on English buses on 7/7, or on Spanish trains on 3/11, or in the countless other murders by the sexually and religiously perverse (how often these two deficiencies coexist) actors of Osama bin Laden’s network. But if not closure here, then where?

In an odd twist, it brings closure to me. I turned 18 years old two days before 9/11. In my third week of college in San Luis Obispo, I was awoken to the television, where I watched the towers fall. I went to math class, where I learned nothing that day. Angry, juvenile, and confused, we took paint to our buddy’s hatchback with scrawls reading “Fuck Bin Laden” and “U-S-A”, and paraded up and down highway 101, relishing in the honks and thumbs-ups from our fellow motorists on the way.

Before September 11th, I was an anxious undergraduate art student, insecure in my choice of majors, and unsure of my desire/capacity to actually make art for a living. I still am. What changed on 9/11 was my confidence in my understanding of the world around me. Why were these people going to such great lengths to attack us? Why are my library books suddenly the curiosity of the Homeland Security Department? Why is the President now talking about waging war on Iraq? Suddenly, it seemed, I didn’t know anything.

I vowed to change that. I switched my major to political science, transferred to San Francisco State University, and secured every internship and volunteer position I could. Canvassing the streets of the Bay Area, I raised $20,000 to defeat George W. Bush in 2004. I graduated with honors, and spoke at my graduation ceremony. During this time, for the first time in my life, I produced very little art.

After unspeakably frustrating months, and then years, trying secure the low-pay work that greets undergraduates, I got a job as a political consultant for a business group on a cause I believed in. I was later promoted, only to watch the campaign collapse two months later. Nearly 10 years have passed since 9/11, and nearly 5 since I graduated college. I have little to show for it other than hundreds of hours of fruitless arguments and a blip on my resume. I am faced with the disconcerting possibility that the whole political enterprise was a perfect waste of time, that in an unforeseen way, the terrorists won.

But then again, no. I’ve learned things, important things. Like the difference between journalism and hack literature, and how cosmopolitan values are superior to tribal ones. I learned about how the phrase “conspiracy theory” libels the noble and scientific word “theory”, and that one should view the intentions of “the people” to be just as suspect as those of “the elite”.  And then this crucial lesson: I learned to distinguish western values worthy of the heap, like racism, imperialism, consumerism, from those worthy of our most tender affection, like free inquiry, free speech, free religion, and women’s rights.

“I never wished a man dead, but I’ve read some obituaries with great pleasure” wrote Mark Twain. In a way, Osama bin Laden’s death brings a pleasurable close to my interest in politics. I’ve learned all that I’m reasonably sure I will ever know about human nature, motivation, and morality. I’m left largely where I started: a revived desire to make art, and unsure as to how to pay for it. The irony is that my newer opinion, that the best society is one of individuals seeking to maximize their talent dividends while leaving alone those who have the decency to leave others alone, is essentially a conservative one. As it happens, such a place would be maximally capable of bringing us the finality of the terrorists losing.


Mardi Gras 2011: Californians in ‘Who Dat’ Nation.

Brass Band on Bourbon

As I heard a New Orleans local put it, “There are only three cities in America: New York, San Francisco, and New Orleans. All the rest are Cleveland.” With all due respect to Chicago and Seattle, I like the company San Francisco seems to keep. Having never before visited the American south, I just returned from four days in New Orleans, during Mardi Gras.

Of course, the food is phenomenal. We dined on excellent fried alligator and duck gumbo at Cuchon, a polished eatery south of the French Quarter that also provided us with perhaps the best service of the trip. Fried alligator tastes like a tough cross between calamari and chicken. Cafe Adelaide came highly recommended, and is apparently an old New Orleans mainstay. Unfortunately, like many mainstays, Adelaide is way past it’s prime. The shrimp in my gumbo tasted like leftovers. Our entrees took way too long but, in a deft blow to service physics, not as long as our appetizers. A labor force fit for a small industrial city was used to deliver our food, which was still delivered to the wrong people. When we complained to the “manager” that (among other things) we were overcharged, he actually argued with us until relenting. Cuchon’s only rival came from Jackson Restaurant, a hip newer establishment in the Lower Garden District, where we ordered fried green tomatoes, chicken maque choux, and fried oysters. The service was excellent, and so was the food.

Delicious 'Gator.

Drinking in New Orleans is a different activity. First and foremost, you can order drinks at the bar to go. I cannot overemphasize the feeling of total victory that consumes your first stride out to the sidewalk, cup in hand. It’s triumphant. Drinking is also dirt cheap. Classic cocktails, martinis, manhattans, and whiskey sours were $5 almost everywhere, as were New Orleans’ signature drinks like a Gin Fizz or Sazerac. Demand for beer is never higher than during Mardi Gras, and

yet the price of the supply is so low (3 buds for $3), it’ll make you wonder if you’re still in America.

Speaking of Mardi Gras…the floats we’re amazing, the crowds were friendly and festive, and there we’re way fewer boobs than I expected. Watching grown adults fiend after otherwise completely worthless plastic beads can be highly rewarding, especially since tens of thousands of abandoned beads literally cover sidewalks and trees. We hit Bourbon Street on Lundi (Monday) Gras, and both

Yep: Those flowers are plastic.

Bourbon and Frenchman Streets on Mardi Gras. Bourbon is awesome, if a bit young, like, 21. No, more like a 21st birthday. It absolutely reeks of beer, as the streets are covered in to-go cups from the bars. Discarded beads are very slippery. The French architecture is gorgeous, and the quarter is larger than you’d maybe expect. Frenchman street is the part of the qu

arter that the locals visit, and we enjoyed live bar-rock and jazz in nearly every establishment on the rue.

I highly recommend taking the Natches steam boat for a two hour trip up the Mississippi river. The boat features passenger access to the engine room, two bars, a gorgeous dining room, and a charming two-piece jazz performance. The kitsch factor, however, is a bit of a let down: The buffet on board is mediocre, and looking around at your fellow passengers, one cannot escape the suspicion that a game of bingo, or perhaps a grand-slam breakfast is not too far off. I’m convinced that if some enterprising young southerners would just

Who Dat?

ditch the buffet for gourmet bar food, dimmed the lights, and swapped the sleepy duet with a smokin’ hot jazz group at one end of the ship and a DJ at the other end, the riverboat industry might regain some of it’s lost glory.

Then there’s the people. Unlike San Francisco, New Orleans is almost perfectly binary on the color spectrum: just black and white. In four days I noticed two Latinos, and thought I was going to make it home without seeing a single Asian until we stumbled into Cafe du Monde, the famous bignet house. Bignets are a New Orleans specialty which consist of fried bread crop dusted with powdered sugar. For what’s essentially the most famous doughnut place in town to be entirely staffed by Chinese Americans was almost too much cliche to bear, even for me. Forget “The Big Easy”, “Who Dat?” is the city’s real motto, as one sees it crammed everywhere from t-shirts to billboards to newspaper front-pages. Style is in rough shape: women frump it up in pajamas, while men only seem to wear non-funny printed t-shirts which read things like “Skilled in Every Position” and “I Don’t Give a Fuck” and (of course) “Who Dat?”. On more than one occasion, I spotted front yards with plastic flowers planted in the ground (our hosts promised us you could see people actually watering their ‘plants’). One finds dilapidated houses everywhere, even in the wealthier districts. Many

Tip of the iceberg.

establishments have balconies, everybody has a porch, and there are mouthbreathers everywhere. The sidewalks present a mortal danger.

Amidst the Mardi Gras swag, I struggled to find a classy piece of New Orleans to take home. Luckily, I found two beautiful original prints at Poets Framing and Gallery on Magazine Street in the Lower Garden district, which is somewhat akin to San Francisco’s Valencia street. If you visit New Orleans, you must visit Stephan Wanger’s art gallery. In an ode to his adopted city after the devastation of Katrina, Wanger is completing a series of mosaics constructed entirely of salvaged Mardi Gras beads. The scope and detail is stunning, and his current piece, when complete, will take the title as worlds largest bead image (take that, 5th graders of Scoil Naomh Iosaf elementary school in Ireland).

We definitely had a great time. Next stop: Cleveland. Just kidding.

Famous mouthbreather.


Breast Milk Ice Cream: Only in England?

A recent UK Guardian article profiled a London creamery’s recent experimentation with ice cream made from human breast milk. The reaction on the internet was apparently such to merit a follow-up opinion piece by Sarah Ditum the very next day, which was kindly forwarded to me by a friend, Sarah Morrison, who also writes for the Guardian. The Ditum piece conceded that, yes, breast-milk ice cream is just plain gross, but then investigated the unclear reasons as to why this is so.

The examples of our irrationality regarding dairy is predictable: Why is it that humans exhibit few reservations about consuming milk products derived from every species but our own? Our careless consumption of dairy throughout our lives renders the argument that humans would naturally reject human milk past nursing age a weak one. Something more emotional is afoot here, and rationalizing our revulsion to the only nutrient mother nature designed explicitly for us may lie beyond the explanatory powers of cool reason.

Ditum’s own explanation is that humans have a hypocritical revulsion to foods that are more willingly given. This just isn’t true. While most of our dairy comes from factory farms with questionable conditions, there’s a reason milk cartons nevertheless depict happy cows in green pastures: people do not like the idea of forced extraction, in any sense. Marketers understand and manipulate this empathy mechanism, built into our DNA as a social primate, routinely: When was the last time you saw images of mutilated goats splashed across your cheese wheel?

Also, Ditum’s characterization of breast milk as the “ultimate, natural free range food” is ludicrous. How is it that one can dismiss cow’s milk for being infused with artificial hormones and questionable feed (which it may or may not be; organic free-range cow’s milk is no longer an elusive product), and then suggest that milk from humans, a species absolutely dedicated to ingesting maximally survivable doses of poison, as the healthier choice?

On that note, imagine what kind of quality-control labels would appear on breast milk products: “Free Range Housewives”, “Vegan and Somehow Producing Milk”, “Hormone-Free and Crying Uncontrollably for Reasons not Entirely Clear”.

Our revulsion to human dairy is beyond reason. No matter how you dice it, it’s just gross.


Gratuitous Culture: Tipping in America

Tipping in America

Two Englishmen walk into a bar. A restaurant actually. On Thanksgiving Day, 2010, two redcoats ran up a $250 check at a high-end San Francisco restaurant and left their waitress, a friend of mine, a $10 tip. That’s 4%. My friend politely asked them if there was anything wrong with either the food or the service, and when they replied everything was indeed fine and good, she informed them: “for future reference, it’s customary to tip 18% in America, 20% in San Francisco”.

This encounter has a way of making both my American and European friends gasp. Americans are astonished at the explosive badness of the tip, while Europeans are astounded at the waitress’ forwardness.

For whatever reason (and there are many) Americans are known for their gratuitous culture, and few behaviors can tarnish a reputation like being known as tight-wad. American tipping habits are so ingrained that, when abroad, we oftentimes cannot bring ourselves to tip the (always lower) local custom, even though it would be in our own self interest. Expedia.com, an online travel company, routinely confirms this through their annual international poll of hoteliers, which–without fail–puts Yanks at the top of the tip-heap (somewhat less flattering is the “worst-dressed” contest, at which we also excel).

On to the reasons. Most explanations begin with the irrefutable fact that service-industry wages and benefits are, on average, far less in America than in Europe. From here, opinions diverge into two camps. The first sees American tipping culture simply as an expression of gratitude, or at the very least, the legacy of a frontier society’s organic response to life with few institutions advocating on behalf of the working class (and a natural revulsion to selfishness in a land of plenty). The second explanation is that American employers are too greedy to pay decent wages and American workers are too dumb to put up a fight, so we tip each other instead to make up the difference. The first camp explains American tipping as an expression of populist generosity, while the second on plutocratic greed and proletarian stupidity. These explanations aren’t simply different, they’re opposite.

From my own experience, Europeans, fall into the second category, believing American-style tips to be a function of greed (an English friend of mine once scoffed at the mere suggestion of generosity playing any roll at all). But to interpret a custom which literally involves handing complete strangers piles of cash as somehow related to greed is no small task, and yet they do it by reasoning that tip-culture is not a response to low wages, but the cause. In this view, Americans are complicit in their own exploitation by paying each other in the form of tips rather than demanding better wages from their employer. By not tipping, or by tipping poorly, some Europeans think they’re striking a blow against injustice. Thus, the European maintains preconceived notions of both American stupidity and greed, while stroking their superiority complex and hanging onto their cash. You’ll have to excuse me, but if this isn’t a petty and cheap self-serving rationalization, I don’t know what is.

As to the fair question of why do some workers get tips while others do not? I’d suggest proximity to be the cause. The banker and the baron may well go their entire lives without speaking to a coal miner, but the bartender they must look in the eyes, and both guilt and fraternity have a way of administering themselves through the retina.

Ultimately, the best reason to tip like an American while in America is simply because, when abroad, one should respect other people’s culture. But because it can be confusing, and because it might not always seem to make sense, here are the basics:

  • 18% good, 15% bad.
  • Gratuity is not “often” included in the bill (as many European websites claim). In fact, it almost never is. The exceptions are for large restaurant parties (usually six or more), banquet events, and hotel room service.
  • A bad waiter doesn’t always merit a bad tip. Depending on the establishment, a waiter might “tip-out” a half-dozen other people such as bussers, hostesses, bartenders, food runners, and wine servers. Consider that when you stiff the waiter, you’re stiffing an entire team.
  • When at the bar, tipping begins at $1 per drink. For large orders, especially those including lots of specialty cocktails, be prepared to dig a bit deeper.
  • If you can’t afford to tip accordingly, stay home. You can’t afford to go out.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.