• About Pacificvs

Tag Archives: hitchens

Sacramento Freethought Day

24 Monday Oct 2011

Posted by Adrian Covert in Artwork

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

art, Dawkins, Freethought day, hitchens, lincoln, Orwell, Paine, painting, sacramento, Zola

Signing posters at the Sacramento Freethought Day.

20111023-134346.jpg

Even more ways to pick up a Hitchens poster.

28 Tuesday Dec 2010

Posted by Adrian Covert in Artwork, Projects

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

art, christopher hitchens, etsy, hitchens, shop, store

I just set up a Pacificvs Etsy shop! From here I’ll be selling prints and collections as they come up. Right now, only the Christopher Hitchens poster is available. But he looks lonely all alone up on that board, so other prints will be joining him soon. Check often: more literary figures are on the way.

Beatles vs. Stones vs. Hitchens

31 Monday May 2010

Posted by Adrian Covert in Readings

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

beatles vs rolling stones, hitch 22, hitchens, revolution, revolution vs. street fighting man, rolling stones, street fighting man, the beatles

But which one is wearing REAL leather?

I was reading Hitch 22, Christopher Hitchens’ freshly published memoir, the other day when I came across this:

“I later vastly preferred Mick Jagger’s ‘Street Fighting Man’, which had been written for my then-friend Tariq Ali, to the Beatles’ more conciliatory ‘You Say You Want a Revolution’…”.

Two things about this Beatles vs. Stones comparison. First, the Beatles song (which is actually titled simply “Revolution”…come on Hitch),  is much smarter than “Street Fighting Man”, which is basically a long lament against “Sleepy London town”.

How Lennon’s grungy rejection of Chairman Mao and “Minds that hate” could be considered “conciliatory” I don’t know. Those same lyrics, presumably, would have been more contextually useful to the actual folks in the streets of 1968 than Mick Jaggers’ context-free killing of the “King and all his servants”. (Note how the English Rolling Stones, in what one might characterize as a conciliatory gesture, spare the Queen).

Second, as with all matters of Beatles vs. Stones, this probably has more to do with perceived cultural differences rather than actual musical ones. Above all else is the perception that the Rolling Stones were, are, in some way, the “edgier” choice. They are certainly the edgier brand. But beyond that I’m not so sure…

It was the Beatles, after all, who were working-class kids from the rough port city, cutting their teeth on the gritty streets of Hamburg and getting their original bassist, Stuart Sutcliffe, killed in a bar fight in the process. Meanwhile, it was the ‘Stones who were the upper-class London prep-school kids with proper accents. The Beatles wrote the Stones’ first hit (the rocker I wanna be your man) because the ‘Stones didn’t yet know how to write music. Add the fact that the heaviest track recorded between the two bands belongs to the Beatles (Helter Skelter by far) and the Rolling Stones’ “edge” begins to look more like a marketing gimmick. The marketing has been convincing though, and one for which Hitchens, ever conscious of his own “radical” brand, has taken a liking.

  • Artwork
  • Readings
  • Projects

Recent Posts

  • Anti-Gentrification Art in San Francisco
  • HITCHENS POSTERS HERE
  • California Water Map
  • Six Californias?
  • Bay Area tech boom not cause of region’s problems

Also Visit

  • Home
  • Adrian Covert Art
  • Shop
  • Molly Covert Design
  • Facebook

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • pacificvs.com
    • Join 29 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • pacificvs.com
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...